{ pirep.airline.icao }{ pirep.flight_number }
{ pirep.dpt_airport.name } ({ pirep.dpt_airport.icao }) to { pirep.arr_airport.name } ({ pirep.arr_airport.icao })
Pilot: { pirep.user.name_private }
Status: { pirep.status_text }
Flight Time: { pirep.flight_time | time_hm }
Distance: { pirep.position.distance.nmi } / { pirep.planned_distance.nmi }
Ground Speed: { pirep.position.gs } knots
Altitude: { pirep.position.altitude } ft
Heading: { pirep.position.heading }°
130
4301h 42m
1,777,183 nmi
1148
193,829
Aircraft Maintenance System Testing Period
Sat, Jan 4, 2025 12:27 AM
Subject to Test, Hard Landing Checks
Due to loads of flights getting cancelled just because pilots landed harder than -600(fpm), we are transistioning into making pilots pay for the maintenance checks in case they did a hard landing.
- -600fpm - PIREPs will be accepted with no penalty.
- -600fpm to -1000fpm - PIREP will be accepted. Pilot flying will be charged for aircraft check.
- More than -1000fpm - PIREP Rejection Criteria w/o any retrieve (unless there was a bug in our system)
Calculation Formula
We would like to share you how do we calculate the penalty outcome for better understanding.
Penalty = (((0.034 * TOW) * 0.0335) * (Landing Rate / 600))
Rounded to Closest Number and only shows 2 decimal number
Operation Risk
With this system, the risk of getting high penalty is when you are using an aircraft with higher MTOW. Currently we dont have exact MTOW set into each aircrafts which the system will calculate your TOW of the aircraft into the MTOW.
At the end, this system might be a better idea to decrease high amount of PIREP cancellation.
However, we will still be listening to everyone's suggestions and critics.
We wish everyone's cooperation.
ANA Virtual Group Operation Division.
